|
|
| RDRS
Identity And Values |
| 1. Broad Principles
In setting and
pursuing its mission, the character of the
organisation and its work is a critical
factor. The RDRS Bangladesh programme has
developed a distinctive identity and value
system, strongly influenced by its past,
its place, and its people (see Diagram)
– this identity, along with underlying
values, underpin the Strategy
2001-2005.
|
a. |
The
centrality of the rural poor- RDRS
has never lost sight of its primary function
and raison d’être - to support
the emergence of, to give voice to, and
to empower the rural poor of the north-west.
All actions must be assessed according to
this fundamental principle. |
b. |
Integrity
and consistency of approach - between
the development programme, the development
organisation and its wider interactions,
RDRS must practise what it preaches; the
same basic developmental principles and
standards should apply in all spheres of
its work as far as possible. Promoting awareness
and democracy must be developed not only
among its constituency, but within the organisation
itself and in its wider advocacy and networking
tasks. Promoting economic viability should
not be restricted only to income-generating
activities of beneficiaries but to all the
organisations own economic work; promoting
environmental or gender awareness cannot
only be limited to its grassroots work with
the poor. The values of honesty, dedication,
participation and transparency are insisted
on throughout. |
 |
c. |
Building
realistically on the present -
effective development must start from where
the people are. Thus the Strategies for
RDRS are seldom radical-departures but the
logical development of past and present
work. The challenge is to build on past
achievements and present strengths and resources,
to overcome weaknesses and setbacks, to
address new challenges, adapt and improve
in a practical and achievable. This evolutionary
approach is essential for a locally–rooted
organisation which has been working for
poverty alleviation in the north since the
birth of the nation. Approaches change,
people and methods evolve but RDRS demonstrates its loyalty and
commitment to its working area and, especially
the poor. |
d. |
Focus
and impact - the geographic concentration
of RDRS’s work, the intensive and
integrated area approach, the linking of
bilateral and core projects to improve impact
demonstrate the seriousness and focus with
which the organisation approaches its work.
RDRS is not concerned with ephemeral tinkering
– it is here on a long-term basis
to make a difference. The Strategies are
an attempt to further strengthen focus and
impact and to make a difference. RDRS scales-up and integratse its work
within its working area to this end. The
themes of targeting, intensification and
popular participation are central to these
strategies. |
e. |
Quality
and effectiveness - RDRS is conscious
of its good reputation among NGOs built
up over many years of dedicated work. The
Strategies seek to guard and enhance this
reputation through improved quality and
increased effectiveness and efficiency of
work. The themes of professionalisation,
systematisation, accountability, cost-effectiveness,
improved technical capacity, transparency
and critical self-analysis are thus emphasised.
|
|
|
| 2. Distinctive Characteristics
of RDRS and its Approach While
there are many similarities with other development
NGOs operating in Bangladesh, RDRS has a
number of distinctive characteristics: |
a. |
Intensive geographic
focus and concentration: The continued
regional concentration of RDRS activities
in 6 Districts of northern Bangladesh has
enabled RDRS to gain acceptance and trust
from the local community, government and
beneficiaries. The concentration of various
developmental and relief interventions through
a network of district, upazila and union
level field workers also creates an intensified
impact reaching towards a `critical mass'
concept of social organisation and development
to be aimed for. Finally, the continued
multi-purpose presence in a fixed number
of localities also increases implementation
capacity, as well as flexibility in operations
and promotes efficient and cost-effective
operation. |
b. |
Integrated
and multidisciplinary approach:
Despite pressures, the RDRS programme pursues
a holistic integrated development towards
poverty and empowerment. Though the organisation
and delivery may not always be fully integrated
(for example due to the differing resource
provision), the programme believes that
the multifaceted nature of poverty requires
a relatively balanced intervention, stressing
for example social and economic dimensions
equally. The concept of a core programme
implies both continuity and integration
– a holistic development foundation
as offering the best means of empowerment
yet which is flexible to respond to additional
opportunities built upon this foundation. |
c. |
Relatively
participatory management style and shared
responsibility: Unlike many national
NGOs, which are the creation of one dynamic
and charismatic founder-leader, RDRS has
developed differently. It has a strong organisational
culture, a distinctive identity and a style
of shared decision-making relying on a broad
cadre of experienced senior staff. With
less than 8% of its total staff in administrative
or support positions in Dhaka or Rangpur,
RDRS also has a very marked field orientation
and focus. |
d. |
Experience
and continuing capacity to learn and to
adapt: Few other organisations
possess such continuity and depth of experience
in relief, rehabilitation and development
work. |
e. |
Building sustainable
peoples' institutions of, by and for the
rural poor: Surprisingly few NGOs
promote the logical development progression
beyond grassroots Primary Groups and thus
remain constrained in service delivery or
support organisation mode. RDRS has consistently
promoted the emergence of this second tier
or apex bodies known as Federation of the
landless and marginal farmers. In addition
to promoting their strengthening as vital
institutional and representative bodies
of the poor RDRS also supports them to develop
economic and several assets under their
control and management. |
|
|
| |
RDRS
Identity |
HISTORY |
 |
28 years
of service as an LWF/WS field
programme. |
 |
At the
birth of the nation, shared
in its birthpains (refugee
relief) and grown up with
it. |
 |
Witnessed/participated
in many changes including
changes in development approach
(relief-development contiuum). |
 |
Faced
repeated challenges of disaster
relief/rehabilitation work. |
 |
Early
pioneers of women's development. |
 |
Several
generations of staff within
the organisation. |
 |
Local
acceptance, and wider reputation
built over the years. |
 |
Operates
within networks of former
beneficiaries, staff, NGOs,
govt officials. |
 |
Undergone
localisation (coming of age). |
 |
It has
helped shape its present rural
working environment (roads,
trees, schools, etc). |
|
|
|
GEOGRAPHY
|
 |
Exclusive
focus on the Northwest (NW). |
 |
Intensive
presence throughout NW, many
staff from the North-West
of Bangladesh. |
 |
Experience
shaped by the environment
of the NW (poverty, drought,
flood, inaccessibility). |
 |
Sympathy/identification
with the NW. |
| |
Ability/confidence
to `make an impact'. |
 |
A voice
for the north, a neglected
region, raising issues/ mobilising
resources for the NW. |
 |
The changing
geography of the NW (development,
greatly improved communication,
reduced isolation). |
 |
Strong
field orientation (Rangpur
not Dhaka is the `head office',
if any). |
 |
Regional
focus but international (the
name RDRS `Bangladesh’
is deliberate). |
 |
Some
shared identity with LWF India
and Nepal (geography, culture,
founding (Hodne), approaches). |
 |
Valued
network of strong international
partners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALUES |
 |
Relatively participatory/democratic. |
 |
Relatively less hierarchic. |
 |
No one-person
operation, diffused and shared
authority/responsibility. |
 |
A type
of partnership with a range
of stakeholders ranging including
core partners, staff, constituency. |
 |
Liberal
Christian/humanitarian values
reflected in the new secular
RDRS. |
 |
Humane, principled. |
 |
Honesty, integrity, openness
and transparency. |
 |
Striving to improve. |
 |
Adaptive, learning, innovative. |
 |
Professional and experienced. |
 |
Solid, established, not self-promoting. |
 |
Field/constituency-focused. |
 |
Pride,
acceptance and respect among
NGOs and others in Bangladesh;
a `reputation' to maintain,
a standard to uphold. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|